Celebrity Feuds

Page 4 of 21 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12 ... 21  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  killershrew on Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:46 pm

bookworm wrote:Jackson family drama.

I know, right? Just when you think things can't get any weirder and more confusing with that bunch, they do.
avatar
killershrew

Posts : 568
Join date : 2011-10-22
Location : Podunk, GA

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  ActonBell on Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:21 pm

The Jackson siblings have long wanted to get their hands on MJ's estate/money, this sounds like a very convoluted attempt to do so.
avatar
ActonBell

Posts : 682
Join date : 2011-11-03

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Shadowlass on Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:40 pm

But why would Janet be involved, then? She has plenty of her own money. It's Janet's involvement that makes me think there's some substance there.

Shadowlass

Posts : 437
Join date : 2011-10-27

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  bookworm on Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:47 pm

Yeah, I was wondering the same thing. If it had just been the brothers behind this, then yeah I would immediately think greed, but Janet and Rebbie being involved gives me pause. Didn't Rebbie practically raise the children after MJ died?
avatar
bookworm

Posts : 1083
Join date : 2011-10-22
Age : 37
Location : Georgia

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  swsa on Tue Jul 24, 2012 4:22 pm

I'm thinking maybe it's money on the brothers' side, but Rebbie and Janet really are concerned about the kids being in Katherine's care. The woman is 82 years old. But I don't know. They're not doing themselves any favors in how they've pursued this. It all looks incredibly shady. That video footage of Janet snatching Paris' phone away while Jermaine tapes it all is just...wtf?
avatar
swsa

Posts : 858
Join date : 2011-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Crowbridge on Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:37 pm

I often wonder why MJ left three young children in the care of an 80 year old woman. I guess she has a lot of help, but still...seems a bit much for someone her age.

Also, wasn't their something in his will about Diana Ross getting the kids if Katherine died? Or am I hallucinating again?

Crowbridge

Posts : 705
Join date : 2011-11-16
Location : California

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  slmader on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:55 am

swsa wrote:I'm thinking maybe it's money on the brothers' side, but Rebbie and Janet really are concerned about the kids being in Katherine's care. The woman is 82 years old. But I don't know. They're not doing themselves any favors in how they've pursued this. It all looks incredibly shady. That video footage of Janet snatching Paris' phone away while Jermaine tapes it all is just...wtf?

An article I saw stated that the children hadn't heard from or seen their grandmother in over a week. Who was looking after them while the grandmother was gone? Do they have nannies?

slmader

Posts : 284
Join date : 2011-10-28
Age : 114
Location : Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  bookworm on Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:05 pm

avatar
bookworm

Posts : 1083
Join date : 2011-10-22
Age : 37
Location : Georgia

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Binky on Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:08 pm


Diana Ross is the back-up guardian?

Poor kids. Who knows what the hell is happening, but if we thought they'd have drama-free lives after their father's dramatic life, I guess not.
avatar
Binky

Posts : 1041
Join date : 2011-10-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Crowbridge on Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:11 pm

Well, they're still Jacksons. Part of the reason Michael became what he did is because his family was full of crazies.

Crowbridge

Posts : 705
Join date : 2011-11-16
Location : California

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  bookworm on Sat Jul 28, 2012 11:39 am

And I thought my family was crazy...

And now there are claims that Paris' tweets really aren't her own? This whole thing boggles the mind.
avatar
bookworm

Posts : 1083
Join date : 2011-10-22
Age : 37
Location : Georgia

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Francie Nolan on Thu Aug 02, 2012 6:34 pm

Now Katherine Jackson is saying she was kidnapped by her children after all. Jermaine has rescinded his signature from the initial letter that alleged shenanigans. Randy is tweeting something. It's all so clear now!

This feels like a rejected script for a 1970s madcap comedy starring the Jackson Five.


Francie Nolan

Posts : 226
Join date : 2011-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Arabella on Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:36 pm


Arabella

Posts : 569
Join date : 2011-10-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Miss Moneypenny on Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:41 pm


Who on earth is John Rich?
avatar
Miss Moneypenny

Posts : 885
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : fauxburbia, MA

http://daisyrazor.blogspot.com

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  biakbiak on Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:03 pm

Half of the country duo Big & Rich and apparently winner of Celebrity Apprentice. I don't get his logic, if you have an inclusive charity you can't point out groups that you don't think are inclusive?
avatar
biakbiak

Posts : 1454
Join date : 2011-10-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  swsa on Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:40 pm

The comments under that article make me want to knock myself unconscious.
avatar
swsa

Posts : 858
Join date : 2011-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  biakbiak on Wed Aug 29, 2012 6:59 pm

That is why I abide by the first and only rule of the internet: DO NOT READ COMMENTS ON ARTICLES!!!

I go through life so much happier than many of my friends and family!
avatar
biakbiak

Posts : 1454
Join date : 2011-10-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Jude on Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:25 pm

biakbiak wrote:That is why I abide by the first and only rule of the internet: DO NOT READ COMMENTS ON ARTICLES!!!
That is such a good rule, seriously.

I watched Celebrity Apprentice this past season, and John Rich conducted final interviews with the contestants since he had won the year before. I got the feeling he didn't like Clay Aiken at all during his interview; he seemed to be just looking to trip him up or piss him off. Or maybe that's just the way John Rich is. I'm not a country music fan, so maybe he's just arrogant and a-holeish to everyone, I don't know.

Team Aiken on this one (reluctantly, since I'm not wild about him either).

Jude

Posts : 432
Join date : 2011-10-31

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Eris Rising on Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:43 pm

biakbiak wrote:Half of the country duo Big & Rich and apparently winner of Celebrity Apprentice. I don't get his logic, if you have an inclusive charity you can't point out groups that you don't think are inclusive?

It's the old "People who won't tolerate intolerance are the truly intolerant ones" nonsense all over again.
avatar
Eris Rising

Posts : 1040
Join date : 2011-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Arabella on Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:33 pm


Arabella

Posts : 569
Join date : 2011-10-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  emrie on Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:44 pm

I honestly clicked on that link thinking you meant Bruce Willis vs. Apple Martin. Which could have been amazing.

emrie

Posts : 312
Join date : 2011-10-22

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Poubelle on Mon Sep 03, 2012 12:46 pm

...I thought so, too. And I was like, why is Bruce Willis picking on a little kid?
avatar
Poubelle

Posts : 691
Join date : 2011-10-22

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  particle_person on Mon Sep 03, 2012 1:05 pm

I hope he takes them on and wins. Apple and Amazon have made such a rights grab, it can't be allowed to continue.

_________________
"Good news, Katniss, I think we've almost got him convinced you're not a mutt!" — Plutarch, attempting to cheer Katniss up about Peeta's condition.
avatar
particle_person
Tech Support

Posts : 1969
Join date : 2011-10-21

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  curryalley on Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:07 pm

Interesting case. It really is time to get whether we own digital muci sorted because it really is counter-intuitive for most people that music you pay for is liscened. We don't think we're renting it, we're buying it.

curryalley

Posts : 218
Join date : 2011-10-22

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Swarley on Mon Sep 03, 2012 5:28 pm

It is. When you purchased vinyl or cassettes or CDs is was yours to share with your friends and/or family as you wished. Suddenly it's digital and you're just borrowing and the music industry can't figure out why people pirate. I'm just as annoyed with Amazon as I am with Apple. My aunt and my mother and I all own Kindles but if they're registered to each of us individually we can't share books. WTF, Amazon? If I bought a hard cover I'd share it and then I'd leave it at the hospital for the next person who wanted it. So now I have three Kindles registered to me.

Swarley

Posts : 406
Join date : 2011-10-27
Age : 116
Location : South Carolina, USA

Back to top Go down

Re: Celebrity Feuds

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 4 of 21 Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 12 ... 21  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum