Publishing Scandals
+96
Fraoch
mandalaya
eventide82
inversed
jstilwe
Kiran
ulkis
Coneycat
Lily Rose
Carrie Ann
Jamie
allochthonous
draco vulgaris
VodouDoll
epudom
curryalley
Shadowlass
BreezyK
bosoxgirl
Heather
Decca
Wildog27
woolhat
Francie Nolan
maxell131313
Bad Username
GirlDrinkDrunk
pamchenko
harvey the penguin
katesti
Red Wolf
Tabby
leone
vwlphb
Esme
UmaOprah
blixie
Binky
Eris Rising
Jessica
Lady V
Morning Angel
Putli Bai
sagitare
Brainchild
Pop'n'Fresh
Snarryfan
Gilraen
oxymoron
Escape
MtOlivePickles
VictorLaszlo
laddical
Gallifrey Girl
mrinsouciance
TiffanyNichelle
ActonBell
punkysdilemma
Cutebutpsycho
Swarley
swsa
punzy
xyzzy
Jude
boutros boutros kitty
pinguerin
puddingcup
Raksha
Luthien
MLIS
Instant Monkeys
mialoubug
biakbiak
Crackie
Auroura76
Rhilin
bbridges
bookworm
year of the cat
Daisy Steiner
Jasmine
DarkSpork
Poubelle
big chicken
Miss Moneypenny
QueenSix
PrincessCleo
Cynara
The Glen
naughty zoot
Paris, Texas
caerbannog
Unlucky Bear
particle_person
Genevieve
RiverThames
100 posters
Page 1 of 17
Page 1 of 17 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9 ... 17
Publishing Scandals
So, Penguin Books recently opened up Book Country, a peer-review site for genre writers that ALSO has some self-publishing options. This has caused some tizzy in the self-publishing community, who feel that THIS one is a scam and horrible. I wrote a little about it here. Writer Beware also logged in their amusement to the fury.
Re: Publishing Scandals
Acclaimed novel may be a memoir, which in itself isn't uncommon but the fact that the author was dismissed for having an affair with a student (LIKE IN THE BOOK) and the "girl" in question doesn't think so kindly of him.
Genevieve- Posts : 679
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
Whoa. Also, I can't believe the NYTimes passed up this story.
particle_person- Tech Support
- Posts : 1973
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
Oh, that is so gross. I can't imagine being betrayed by your teacher like that. I feel so bad for "Marie."
Unlucky Bear- Official Succubus
- Posts : 1036
Join date : 2011-10-21
Age : 39
Location : Suburban Chicago
Re: Publishing Scandals
Setting aside the whole "do not sleep with your students" rule, this guy totally broke the Dan Savage "campsite" rule of dating a younger person. In a relationship where there is an obvious power imbalance, Savage always says that in the position of power/age/whatever, it is your responsibility to leave said person in a better place than you found them. This writer apparently littered the hell out of the metaphorical campsite and then had the arrogance to make some money off of it.
I am really curious (if he indeed do this, as it looks like) did he think that no one would come forward and go, "um...yeah about that?"
I am really curious (if he indeed do this, as it looks like) did he think that no one would come forward and go, "um...yeah about that?"
Genevieve- Posts : 679
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
OH ICK. That poor girl. The fact that he wrote some of the narration from her POV is particularly disturbing. I hope the scandal sours any future book deals for him.
caerbannog- Posts : 34
Join date : 2011-10-22
Re: Publishing Scandals
This has the be so common. Using the details about someone else's life in a narrative that benefits the author and effectively disenfranchises the subject is the stuff art is made of. Many smart, awkward young girls are susceptible to the attention of experienced older men and get burnt. So to have him write an acclaimed novel positing himself as the object of her gaze must be sickening in light of the fact that her final line in the novel is "I still dream about him".
Paris, Texas- Posts : 140
Join date : 2011-10-28
Re: Publishing Scandals
Isn't that basically half the plot of Music and Lyrics?
naughty zoot- Posts : 1103
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Western Mass
Re: Publishing Scandals
naughty zoot wrote:Isn't that basically half the plot of Music and Lyrics?
That was the first thing I thought when I read the story.
The author sounds as if he's one of those people for whom academia is just a way for them to get their "narcissistic supply".
The Glen- Mod Squad
- Posts : 725
Join date : 2011-10-21
Location : Unemployed in Greenland
Re: Publishing Scandals
It is also very interesting that commenters are popping up all over the place, (jezebel and a few other websites) who recall having him as a teacher and what went on (it seems that as he left a month before the end of the term, he also managed to mess up everyone's grades in the process) and the general chaos he created. There were also people who went to school with this guy who have some telling things to say about his character.
One talented sociopath.
One talented sociopath.
Genevieve- Posts : 679
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
And the reason the NYT Times didn't care, I would guess, is that the whole "is it true/is it fiction" concept is soooo trendy now--like, in my grad class we're doing a whole unit on "creative nonfiction." That blurred line is totally A Thing in writing/publishing/academia right now, sort of this "Well, True Intellectuals don't have to concern themselves with 'truth" and 'fiction' distinctions, that is for Oprah readers" attitude. Apparently it now extends to "True Intellectuals don't have to care that a 17-year-old girl's very real pain is now a source of literary acclaim for a pathological cockface." I mean, seriously, "I still dream about him"?!?! How is that not SCREAMINGLY OBVIOUSLY the work of a complete narcissist?
Cynara- Posts : 421
Join date : 2011-10-23
Re: Publishing Scandals
I took a class on creative non-fiction writing once (it would have been around 2001). At that time, it didn't mean stealing from life, it meant writing about non-fiction topics in a creative way. For example, we read Lewis Thomas's essay on earthworms, Stephen J. Gould on baseball statistics and whether certain pitchers consistently did better than probability could predict (he thought so, I disagreed), Jessica Mitford on the horrific methods used by embalmers on bodies all for the purpose of charging people more. The facts were all true, but the presentation and approach were creative. The closest we got to blurring the lines was the very last section on "postmodernism" in which we read some bizarre story that was clearly fiction and ADKJSFJEWKKJlsakjfsdfgkljzxmvxkv. As all postmodern things go.
particle_person- Tech Support
- Posts : 1973
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
Oooh, now that's an interesting read. I had missed the kerfuffle about the Tempest pre-review thingie. I do see on the second link that Celine Kiernan (writer of The Moorehawke Trilogy) pops up as a reasonable commentator. After Leigh Fallon going a bit bonkers, it's nice to see an Irish YA author who's a bit more level-headed.
But bloody hell, they're all going crackers over there!
But bloody hell, they're all going crackers over there!
QueenSix- Posts : 1314
Join date : 2011-10-22
Location : City of the Tribes, West of Ireland
Re: Publishing Scandals
PrincessCleo wrote:What in God's name is in the water over at GoodReads?
I feel the same way about a lot of authors that I feel about most celebrities online: I want to grab their shoulders and yell, "YOU. NEED. TO. NOT TALK."
Re: Publishing Scandals
2012 seems to be the years of authors behaving badly on GoodReads. I think this is like the third skirmish I've heard orginating from that site.
big chicken- Posts : 683
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
I really had no idea that good reads was some kind of drama llama factory farm. It is certainly something else.
Genevieve- Posts : 679
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
big chicken wrote:2012 seems to be the years of authors behaving badly on GoodReads. I think this is like the third skirmish I've heard orginating from that site.
Well, that link itself describes three or four separate ones. And I swear I read an entirely different author hissy fit they didn't even include. There was a rash of this business last year with the "YA Mafia" thing, but omg, all of these seemingly unrelated in a single week. I don't even know.
Re: Publishing Scandals
It's like LJ in the Harry Potter years, but with ALL THE BOOKS. So many more opportunities for mayhem. In math, they call it a "combinatoric explosion," which I suppose fits with the idea of wanking pretty well.Genevieve wrote:I really had no idea that good reads was some kind of drama llama factory farm. It is certainly something else.
It's kind of the reverse of HP though, in the sense that the authors are bringing most of the drama. I'm used to seeing it from fandom.
particle_person- Tech Support
- Posts : 1973
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
There have been a lot of blog posts musing on what the hell is going on here, but one (and I wish I could remember which one) was talking about how there seems to be this idea that your sales are tied to your reviews, and so it seems that these writers (all of them fairly new, it looks like, and getting published in a genre that is itself new and huge and maybe going through some growing pains) are convinced that they have to go ~DO SOMETHING!!!~ about these nasty reviewers who are totes going to ruin their careers.I'm used to seeing it from fandom.
Also, someone on Absolute Write pointed out that the Halpern blog entry reads exactly like a fanfic writer tantrum. A lot of YA and/or fantasy writers these days seem to be in their 20s or early 30s and probably cut their teeth on internet fandoms. I mean, Judy Blume's on Twitter, but I think she's been around so long that she knows better than to give a shit, and this kind of widespread Jets/Sharks rumbling seems more in the spirit of fandom.
Re: Publishing Scandals
particle_person wrote:It's kind of the reverse of HP though, in the sense that the authors are bringing most of the drama. I'm used to seeing it from fandom.
That's very true and it makes me wonder now if any of these writers were at some point involved in a fandom. Not even in a drama llama sense of OMGHARMONIANS4EVR, but perhaps some TV show or something that they'd discuss online with others and because of that online upbringing so to speak (like Cleo said yesterday on Twitter, these authors are very much a part of the Internet Generation), this is their default reaction to dealing with situations like this.
That's not to say that any of us who have been involved in fandoms would react that way in similar circumstances, but this is just what these particular people think is appropriate.
Just a thought because that's a lot of author crazy to happen in a short space of time.
Edited to add: Cleo posted her thoughts as I was typing.
QueenSix- Posts : 1314
Join date : 2011-10-22
Location : City of the Tribes, West of Ireland
Re: Publishing Scandals
PrincessCleo wrote:
....there seems to be this idea that your sales are tied to your reviews.
Wouldn't that be reviews in major publications, though, not random ones on the internet? (And wouldn't reviews someplace like Amazon have more weight than GoodReads? I think what's more important at both places is if the overall trend is to four- or five-star reviews, not if there's individual one-star reviews. Especially since it's the bestsellers that get popular enough to have a full range of rankings.)
Of course, I think the idea "good reviews=automatic good sales!" just sounds woefully naive. And it seems extra-naive if anyone truly involved in the internet/blog world hasn't learned this lesson.
Poubelle- Posts : 691
Join date : 2011-10-22
Re: Publishing Scandals
If any of these people had actually been in online fandoms, you'd think they'd know better. Such behavior stinks of fannish newbies to me, but my own experiences with so-called pros behaving badly in the face of fandom negativity has mostly come from folks new to the whole concept. (And/or folks with control issues, but that's another post entirely.)
DarkSpork- Posts : 12
Join date : 2011-11-11
Re: Publishing Scandals
PrincessCleo wrote:There have been a lot of blog posts musing on what the hell is going on here, but one (and I wish I could remember which one) was talking about how there seems to be this idea that your sales are tied to your reviews, and so it seems that these writers (all of them fairly new, it looks like, and getting published in a genre that is itself new and huge and maybe going through some growing pains) are convinced that they have to go ~DO SOMETHING!!!~ about these nasty reviewers who are totes going to ruin their careers.I'm used to seeing it from fandom.
The problem with that theory is that quite a few of the kerfuffles involve OTHER authors weighing in. Like, Flannery reviewed a book by Melina Marchetta but the wank was started by Danielle Weiller, not Marchetta. If the problem is that Weiller thought someone was going to ruin her career, wouldn't it be a review of one of her own books, not some other author's? Similarly, Kira reviewed Julie Cross's book, but the wank began with Dan Krokos, not Cross.
My theory is that something happened in authorspace, some internal discussion about how Goodreads reviewers are awful and vicious and nasty, and the participants in that discussion then went forth all riled up, and started fights.
particle_person- Tech Support
- Posts : 1973
Join date : 2011-10-21
Re: Publishing Scandals
Well, true, that could have been the case. At the same time, it's easy for friends to want to go off and fight battles for you, if you both believe that good reviews are necessary to your livelihood.My theory is that something happened in authorspace, some internal discussion about how Goodreads reviewers are awful and vicious and nasty, and the participants in that discussion then went forth all riled up, and started fights.
Yeah--I even keep wondering why writers keep doing this after OTHER writers have already flamed out doing it, forget fandom experiences. At the same time, you see it all the time on Fandom Wank--people who've been around long enough to know better, but go off the rails anyway.If any of these people had actually been in online fandoms, you'd think they'd know better. Such behavior stinks of fannish newbies to me, but my own experiences with so-called pros behaving badly in the face of fandom negativity has mostly come from folks new to the whole concept. (And/or folks with control issues, but that's another post entirely.)
Page 1 of 17 • 1, 2, 3 ... 9 ... 17
Page 1 of 17
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|